Senate Republicans Question New Criteria for Special Ed. Evaluations - Politics K-12 - Education Week

Senate Republicans Question New Criteria for Special Ed. Evaluations - Politics K-12 - Education Week



« What's the Plan for Examining Whether Investing in Innovation Worked? | Main | Republican Lawmakers Ask GAO to Probe NCLB Waivers »

Senate Republicans Question New Criteria for Special Ed. Evaluations

By Lauren Camera on August 12, 2014 2:06 PM
UPDATED
Senate Republicans on the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee are upset about the U.S. Department of Education's recent decision to evaluate states' special education systems based on the academic performance of students with disabilities.
"This is clear influence and coercion, if not direct control," the GOP committee members wrote to U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan in a letter dated Aug. 4. "It is troubling that the department made unilateral changes to the [Individuals with Disabilities Act] compliance framework without seeking legislative approval, disregarded congressional intent, and appears to have violated the clear letter of the law."
In June, the department rolled out of a revised evaluation process that emphasizes results-driven accountability. As my colleague Christina Samuels reported over at the On Special Education blog, the 2004 reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, or IDEA, requires that states submit data to the Education Department about how students with disabilities are doing.
But before this year's annual report, states were only graded on what are called "compliance" indicators, such as whether students were evaluated for special education in the appropriate amount of time, or whether due process complaints were resolved in a timely fashion. Now, states are being checked on factors such as test scores from the National Assessment of Education Progress, or NAEP, and the gap between those scores and the scores of children in the general population, in addition to compliance.
"The changes spelled out in your 'Results-Driven Accountability' framework clearly amount to federal influence on the standards and assessments states and school districts use to direct the education program of students with disabilities and would give the federal government authority to use students proficiency as measured by the NAEP to evaluate and either reward or sanction school districts," the Republicans wrote.
You can read the full letter here.
[UPDATE (5:20 p.m.): The Education Department plans to use NAEP scores only temporarily until all states adopt new assessments, according to a department official. Once states have transitioned to assessments that are aligned with college and career standards, the department will discontinue the use of the NAEP scores and participation rates and use state assessment data instead. The official also said that the department has considered multiple measures of student performance in addition to the procedural compliance with IDEA.
In fact, out of the 42 possible points a state may receive on the results and compliance matrices, only 12 are related to NAEP, less than 30 percent of the total.]
The letter, which specifically asks the Education Department for the exact statutory language that allows it to shift the special education evaluation, comes just one week after House Republicans cleared a resolution authorizing a lawsuit against President Barack Obama for his use of executive authority.
And it joins in a long list of Republican charges that the administration has overstepped its legal authority on a variety of education initiatives, including No Child Left Behind waivers and its signature competitive grant program, Race to the Top.
"We have received the letter and look forward to responding," said Education Deparment spokeswoman Dorie Nolt, in response. "The Department's Results Driven Accountability framework focuses on improving results for children with disabilities while continuing to ensure compliance with the requirements of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Our goal is to work with states and school districts to improve educational results for all children with disabilities

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Missouri Schools - The Washington Post

Missouri Schools - The Washington Post Some schools brag about their high passing rates on AP or IB, meaning the percentage of test-takers who scored 3, 4 or 5 on the 5-point AP exam or 4, 5, 6 or 7 on the 7-point IB exam. Passing scores make students eligible for credit at many colleges and universities. I decided not to count passing rates in this way because I found that many high schools kept those rates artificially high by allowing only top students to take the courses. AP, IB and AICE are important because they give average students a chance to experience the trauma of heavy college reading lists and long, analytical college examinations. Research has found that even low-performing students who got a 2 on an AP test did significantly better in college than similar students who did not take AP. On the list, we also give readers a sense of how well each school’s students are doing on the tests by posting the Equity and Excellence rate, which is the percentage of all graduating s
Read more

My Letter Requesting To Become A Board Member

Sherri R. Tucker 1200 SE London Way Lee’s Summit, MO   64081 816-554-3017 autism@kc.rr.com Lee’s Summit R-7 School District C/o Linda Ismert, Board Secretary Stansberry Leadership Center 301 NE Tudor Road Lee’s Summit, MO   64086 Ms Ismert I would like to submit my name for the position on the Lee’s Summit R-7 School Board.   As you know, I have expressed an interest in being on the school board in the past.   On my first attempt I only lost by 2% which would indicate that the voters have an interest in me being on the board as well.   I would think that the voters’ wishes would be taken into consideration. I have a strong relationship with many of the districts’ families and I can help to bridge the gap between them and the district.   I understand the commitment to the time and energy required each week for meetings, phone calls, conversations, visits to schools, and professional development seminars and workshops.   I already do that with the families that I work with and can c
Read more

School Board Candidates

I am attempting to find information on the school board candidates.  It has been much easier in the past.  This year it has been more difficult.  Susan D. Coffman Susan Coffman has served as the Outreach Program Coordinator and Finance Officer for Lee’s Summit CARES since 2008. She has been a mayor-appointed representative to the Human Services Advisory Board, facilitated alcohol retailer trainings, organized the annual Holly Festival with the DARE program, managed bookkeeping and accounting, and served as the community liaison between LS CARES and local business, universities and the cities.  Coffman’s financial background includes work as a customer support specialist at Jack Henry & Associates Inc. for 11 years and assistant vice president and customer support specialist at Merchants Bank for 17 years.  Her community activities include serving on the Human Services Advisory Board, Paradise Park Advisory Board, Lee’s Summit Social Services Board, former treasurer of Rotary C
Read more